Compare software

Compare 3DCoat with alternatives

• 3DCoat vs Adobe Substance 3D PainterAdobe Substance 3D Painter handles the texture painting side with a layer-based workflow, but it does not sculpt, needs an Adobe account and runs only on Windows and macOS.
• 3DCoat vs Adobe Substance 3D ModelerAdobe Substance 3D Modeler offers sculpting on the desktop or in VR with automatic UV handling, but it runs only on Windows and needs an Adobe subscription.
• 3DCoat vs Marmoset ToolbagAll-in-one 3D application for texture baking, texturing, painting and real-time rendering.
• 3DCoat vs ZBrushZBrush focuses on brush-based sculpting and detailing, runs on Windows and macOS only, and needs a paid licence, with no Linux build.
• 3DCoat vs ArmorPaintArmorPaint is open source and covers PBR texture painting with node-based materials, but it has no sculpting or retopology and a smaller user base.
• 3DCoat vs InstaMATA desktop application for procedural material authoring, layer-based 3D texturing and automated asset pipelines.
• 3DCoat vs MariProfessional 3D texture painting software for film, VFX and other high-detail digital assets.
• 3DCoat vs Material MakerAn open-source node-based tool for authoring procedural PBR materials and textures for game engines.
• 3DCoat vs Nomad SculptNomad Sculpt offers sculpting and painting with a touch-oriented interface on iOS, Android, Windows and macOS, though licensing and features differ between platform editions.
• 3DCoat vs BlenderBlender is free and open source under GPL and covers sculpting alongside modelling, animation and rendering, but it is a large application with a long learning curve.
• 3DCoat vs SculptGLSculptGL is free, open source and runs in a browser with dynamic topology, but it lacks retopology, texturing depth and production pipeline features.