Compare software

3DPrinterOS vs FDM Monster: catalog facts
3DPrinterOSFDM Monster

Screenshots

FDM Monster printer dashboard

Best for: Universities and companies running shared 3D printer fleets

Best for: Running a mixed 3D printer farm from one self-hosted dashboard

Paid

Paid cloud service with a 14-day trial.

Free

Source code is published on GitHub, and no paid tier is mentioned.

Web Web, Self-hosted
  • Central control of many printers and users
  • Visibility into who prints what and where
All 3 strengths for 3DPrinterOS
  • Central control of many printers and users
  • Visibility into who prints what and where
  • Aimed at schools, labs and print farms
  • Supports OctoPrint, Moonraker, PrusaLink and Bambu Lab printers in one dashboard
  • Runs on your own local network or server
All 4 strengths for FDM Monster
  • Supports OctoPrint, Moonraker, PrusaLink and Bambu Lab printers in one dashboard
  • Runs on your own local network or server
  • Docker setup included in the repository
  • Actively developed with a long commit history
  • Cloud-only service
  • Designed for organisations rather than a single home printer
  • Needs a server and some setup before use
  • Aimed at multi-printer setups, so it adds overhead for a single printer
All 3 limitations for FDM Monster
  • Needs a server and some setup before use
  • Aimed at multi-printer setups, so it adds overhead for a single printer
  • License is not stated in the research
Web application, Hosted service Self-hosted
Not open source Not open source
License not stated License not stated
Account needed Not stated if an account is needed
Not stated if it works offline Not stated if it works offline
Sources for 3DPrinterOS

Catalog checked September 23, 2026

Sources for FDM Monster

Catalog checked September 24, 2026

“Not stated” means we have not confirmed it. Features can vary by device and plan.