3DPrinterOS vs FDM Monster: catalog facts
3DPrinterOS | FDM Monster |
| |
|
Best for: Universities and companies running shared 3D printer fleets |
Best for: Running a mixed 3D printer farm from one self-hosted dashboard |
|
Paid Paid cloud service with a 14-day trial. |
Free Source code is published on GitHub, and no paid tier is mentioned. |
|
Web |
Web, Self-hosted |
- Central control of many printers and users
- Visibility into who prints what and where
All 3 strengths for 3DPrinterOS- Central control of many printers and users
- Visibility into who prints what and where
- Aimed at schools, labs and print farms
|
- Supports OctoPrint, Moonraker, PrusaLink and Bambu Lab printers in one dashboard
- Runs on your own local network or server
All 4 strengths for FDM Monster- Supports OctoPrint, Moonraker, PrusaLink and Bambu Lab printers in one dashboard
- Runs on your own local network or server
- Docker setup included in the repository
- Actively developed with a long commit history
|
- Cloud-only service
- Designed for organisations rather than a single home printer
|
- Needs a server and some setup before use
- Aimed at multi-printer setups, so it adds overhead for a single printer
All 3 limitations for FDM Monster- Needs a server and some setup before use
- Aimed at multi-printer setups, so it adds overhead for a single printer
- License is not stated in the research
|
|
Web application, Hosted service |
Self-hosted |
|
Not open source |
Not open source |
|
License not stated |
License not stated |
|
Account needed |
Not stated if an account is needed |
|
Not stated if it works offline |
Not stated if it works offline |
Sources for 3DPrinterOSCatalog checked September 23, 2026 |
Sources for FDM MonsterCatalog checked September 24, 2026 |
“Not stated” means we have not confirmed it. Features can vary by device and plan.
Copy comparison link