Compare software

Apache ActiveMQ vs NATS Server: catalog facts
Apache ActiveMQ	NATS Server
Best for: Teams that need a self-hosted message broker for their applications	Best for: Developers building distributed systems that need a messaging backbone
Free Free and open source under the Apache 2.0 licence.	Free Free and open source under the Apache 2.0 licence.
Windows, Self-hosted	Windows, Self-hosted, Command line
Supports JMS, AMQP, STOMP and MQTT Clients available for many languages All 4 strengths for Apache ActiveMQ Supports JMS, AMQP, STOMP and MQTT Clients available for many languages High availability and networks of brokers Regular maintenance releases on several series	Built for high performance Runs on servers, in Docker or at the edge All 3 strengths for NATS Server Built for high performance Runs on servers, in Docker or at the edge Large, actively maintained open-source project
Requires Java and server administration Aimed at developers and operators, not end users	Infrastructure component that needs NATS clients in your applications Aimed at developers and operators, not end users
Downloadable app, Self-hosted	Downloadable app, Self-hosted
Open source	Open source
License: Apache-2.0	License: Apache-2.0
No account needed	No account needed
Not stated if it works offline	Not stated if it works offline
Official website Full listing and sources Sources for Apache ActiveMQ activemq.apache.org Catalog checked October 2, 2026	Official website Full listing and sources Sources for NATS Server nats.io github.com/nats-io/nats-server Catalog checked October 2, 2026

“Not stated” means we have not confirmed it. Features can vary by device and plan.