bfs vs fd: catalog facts
bfs | fd |
|
Best for: Terminal users who rely on find and want nearby results first |
Best for: Finding a file when you remember part of its name |
|
Free Free and open source. |
Free Free and open source, dual licensed under the Apache 2.0 and MIT licences. |
|
macOS, Linux, Command line |
Windows, macOS, Linux, Command line |
- Breadth-first order finds shallow matches first
- Drop-in compatible with GNU, BSD, macOS and POSIX find
All 3 strengths for bfs- Breadth-first order finds shallow matches first
- Drop-in compatible with GNU, BSD, macOS and POSIX find
- Existing find syntax works unchanged
|
- One short argument instead of find's syntax
- Smart case: case-insensitive until your pattern contains a capital
All 4 strengths for fd- One short argument instead of find's syntax
- Smart case: case-insensitive until your pattern contains a capital
- Parallel traversal and parallel command execution
- Respects gitignore and skips hidden files by default
|
- Keeps find's syntax, which some users find awkward
- No native Windows support mentioned
|
- Command line only
- Does not aim to cover all of find's functionality
All 4 limitations for fd- Command line only
- Does not aim to cover all of find's functionality
- The opinionated defaults need flags to turn off
- Not present by default on any system
|
|
Downloadable app |
Downloadable app |
|
Open source |
Open source |
|
License not stated |
License: Apache-2.0 |
|
No account needed |
No account needed |
|
Offline features available |
Offline features available |
Sources for bfsCatalog checked September 23, 2026 |
Sources for fdCatalog checked September 21, 2026 |
“Not stated” means we have not confirmed it. Features can vary by device and plan.
Copy comparison link