bfs vs GNU findutils: catalog facts
bfs | GNU findutils |
|
Best for: Terminal users who rely on find and want nearby results first |
Best for: Searching for files and acting on them from a Unix shell |
|
Free Free and open source. |
Free Free software from the GNU Project. |
|
macOS, Linux, Command line |
Linux, Command line |
- Breadth-first order finds shallow matches first
- Drop-in compatible with GNU, BSD, macOS and POSIX find
All 3 strengths for bfs- Breadth-first order finds shallow matches first
- Drop-in compatible with GNU, BSD, macOS and POSIX find
- Existing find syntax works unchanged
|
- Powerful file matching by name, type, size, time and more
- locate gives very fast lookups from a file name database
All 3 strengths for GNU findutils- Powerful file matching by name, type, size, time and more
- locate gives very fast lookups from a file name database
- xargs runs commands over large lists of files
|
- Keeps find's syntax, which some users find awkward
- No native Windows support mentioned
|
- locate results are only as current as the last updatedb run
- Option syntax is dense and takes time to learn
|
|
Downloadable app |
Downloadable app |
|
Open source |
Open source |
|
License not stated |
License: GPL-3.0-or-later |
|
No account needed |
No account needed |
|
Offline features available |
Offline features available |
Sources for bfsCatalog checked September 23, 2026 |
Sources for GNU findutilsCatalog checked October 1, 2026 |
“Not stated” means we have not confirmed it. Features can vary by device and plan.
Copy comparison link