DesignSpark PCB vs KiCad: catalog facts
DesignSpark PCB | KiCad |
|
Best for: Hobbyists and engineers designing circuit boards on a budget |
Best for: Designing a circuit board end to end without a commercial licence |
|
Free + paid options Free plan available, with paid Creator and Engineer plans that add advanced features. |
Free Free and open source under the GPL 3.0. Donations are handled through the Linux Foundation. |
|
Windows |
Windows, macOS, Linux |
- Free plan without limits on layers, connections or schematic size
- Schematic capture and PCB layout in one program
All 3 strengths for DesignSpark PCB- Free plan without limits on layers, connections or schematic size
- Schematic capture and PCB layout in one program
- Interactive HTML BOM export and length-matching routing in higher plans
|
- Schematic capture, PCB layout, 3D viewer and Gerber export in one suite
- No limits on board size, layer count or exports
All 4 strengths for KiCad- Schematic capture, PCB layout, 3D viewer and Gerber export in one suite
- No limits on board size, layer count or exports
- Large bundled symbol and footprint libraries, plus a plugin manager
- Windows, macOS, Linux AppImage and Flathub builds
|
- Several newer features are limited to paid plans
- Not open source
|
- A real learning curve; the workflow is unlike a drawing program
- Simulation is basic next to dedicated SPICE packages
All 3 limitations for KiCad- A real learning curve; the workflow is unlike a drawing program
- Simulation is basic next to dedicated SPICE packages
- Library management trips up most newcomers at least once
|
|
Downloadable app |
Downloadable app |
|
Not open source |
Open source |
|
License not stated |
License: GPL-3.0 |
|
Not stated if an account is needed |
No account needed |
|
Not stated if it works offline |
Offline features available |
Sources for DesignSpark PCBCatalog checked September 24, 2026 |
Sources for KiCadCatalog checked September 21, 2026 |
“Not stated” means we have not confirmed it. Features can vary by device and plan.
Copy comparison link