dwl vs river: catalog facts
dwl | river |
|
Best for: dwm users moving to Wayland who want a minimal tiling compositor |
Best for: Linux users who want to build or choose their own Wayland window manager |
|
Free Free and open source. |
Free Free and open source. |
|
Linux |
Linux |
- dwm-style dynamic tiling on Wayland
- Small C codebase built on wlroots
All 4 strengths for dwl- dwm-style dynamic tiling on Wayland
- Small C codebase built on wlroots
- Community patch collection for extra features
- Actively maintained
|
- Window management policy is a separate, replaceable program
- Documented window management protocol
All 3 strengths for river- Window management policy is a separate, replaceable program
- Documented window management protocol
- Actively developed with regular releases
|
- Customisation usually means editing source and recompiling
- Minimal by design, so bars and extras come from other tools
|
- Needs a separate window manager to be useful
- Building from source requires the Zig toolchain
All 3 limitations for river- Needs a separate window manager to be useful
- Building from source requires the Zig toolchain
- Older configurations belong to river-classic
|
|
Downloadable app |
Downloadable app |
|
Open source |
Open source |
|
License not stated |
License not stated |
|
No account needed |
No account needed |
|
Offline features available |
Offline features available |
Sources for dwlCatalog checked September 24, 2026 |
Sources for riverCatalog checked September 23, 2026 |
“Not stated” means we have not confirmed it. Features can vary by device and plan.
Copy comparison link