Elm vs PureScript: catalog facts
Elm | PureScript |
|
Best for: Web developers who want a typed functional language for front ends |
Best for: Developers who want Haskell-style typed functional programming for JavaScript targets |
|
Free Free and open source under the BSD-3-Clause licence. |
Free Free and open source under the MIT licence. |
|
Windows, Command line |
Windows, macOS, Linux, Command line |
- Compiler error messages explain problems and suggest fixes
- Type inference catches runtime errors at compile time
All 4 strengths for Elm- Compiler error messages explain problems and suggest fixes
- Type inference catches runtime errors at compile time
- Consistent program architecture across projects
- Online playground for trying the language
|
- Expressive type system with row polymorphism and type classes
- Compiles to readable JavaScript with easy interop
All 4 strengths for PureScript- Expressive type system with row polymorphism and type classes
- Compiles to readable JavaScript with easy interop
- Editor support with instant rebuilds
- Searchable library documentation on Pursuit
|
- Only targets web front ends
- Interop with JavaScript libraries takes extra work
|
- Smaller ecosystem than mainstream JavaScript or TypeScript
- Functional style has a learning curve for newcomers
|
|
Downloadable app |
Downloadable app |
|
Open source |
Open source |
|
License: BSD-3-Clause |
License: MIT |
|
No account needed |
No account needed |
|
Offline features available |
Offline features available |
Sources for ElmCatalog checked October 2, 2026 |
Sources for PureScriptCatalog checked October 2, 2026 |
“Not stated” means we have not confirmed it. Features can vary by device and plan.
Copy comparison link