fish vs Xonsh: catalog facts
fish | Xonsh |
|
Best for: An interactive shell that is pleasant immediately, with nothing to configure |
Best for: Python users who want to script and work at the command line in one language |
|
Free Free and open source under the GPL. |
Free Free to use, with optional sponsorship through GitHub Sponsors. |
|
macOS, Linux, Command line |
Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, Command line |
- Autosuggestions from history appear as you type with no plugins
- Syntax highlighting shows an invalid command before you run it
All 4 strengths for fish- Autosuggestions from history appear as you type with no plugins
- Syntax highlighting shows an invalid command before you run it
- Tab completions generated from man pages, so they cover real options
- Works well with no configuration file at all
|
- Python code and shell commands mix in one language
- Access to the full Python library ecosystem from the prompt
All 4 strengths for Xonsh- Python code and shell commands mix in one language
- Access to the full Python library ecosystem from the prompt
- Runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, BSD and Android
- Extensible through xontrib plugins
|
- Not POSIX-compatible, so bash snippets and scripts often need changing
- No official Windows build
All 4 limitations for fish- Not POSIX-compatible, so bash snippets and scripts often need changing
- No official Windows build
- A smaller plugin ecosystem than zsh
- Minimum supported macOS version is 10.12
|
- Syntax differs from POSIX shells, so existing Bash scripts need changes
- Most useful to people who already know Python
|
|
Downloadable app |
Downloadable app |
|
Open source |
Open source |
|
License: GPL-2.0 |
License not stated |
|
No account needed |
No account needed |
|
Offline features available |
Offline features available |
Sources for fishCatalog checked September 21, 2026 |
Sources for XonshCatalog checked September 24, 2026 |
“Not stated” means we have not confirmed it. Features can vary by device and plan.
Copy comparison link