fish vs zsh-autosuggestions: catalog facts
fish | zsh-autosuggestions |
|
Best for: An interactive shell that is pleasant immediately, with nothing to configure |
Best for: Zsh users who want Fish-style command suggestions |
|
Free Free and open source under the GPL. |
Free Free and open source. |
|
macOS, Linux, Command line |
macOS, Linux, Command line |
- Autosuggestions from history appear as you type with no plugins
- Syntax highlighting shows an invalid command before you run it
All 4 strengths for fish- Autosuggestions from history appear as you type with no plugins
- Syntax highlighting shows an invalid command before you run it
- Tab completions generated from man pages, so they cover real options
- Works well with no configuration file at all
|
- Fish-like suggestions from command history
- Fast and unobtrusive
All 4 strengths for zsh-autosuggestions- Fish-like suggestions from command history
- Fast and unobtrusive
- Works with common Zsh plugin managers
- Configurable strategies and highlight style
|
- Not POSIX-compatible, so bash snippets and scripts often need changing
- No official Windows build
All 4 limitations for fish- Not POSIX-compatible, so bash snippets and scripts often need changing
- No official Windows build
- A smaller plugin ecosystem than zsh
- Minimum supported macOS version is 10.12
|
- Zsh only
- Suggestions come from history, so they are only as good as what you have typed before
|
|
Downloadable app |
Downloadable app |
|
Open source |
Open source |
|
License: GPL-2.0 |
License: MIT |
|
No account needed |
No account needed |
|
Offline features available |
Offline features available |
Sources for fishCatalog checked September 21, 2026 |
Sources for zsh-autosuggestionsCatalog checked September 24, 2026 |
“Not stated” means we have not confirmed it. Features can vary by device and plan.
Copy comparison link