flash vs balenaEtcher: catalog facts
flash | balenaEtcher |
|
Best for: Users preparing SD cards for devices such as Raspberry Pi |
Best for: Writing one bootable image to one USB stick without destroying the wrong drive |
|
Free Free and open source under the MIT license. |
Free Free and open source under the Apache 2.0 licence. Balena sells separate commercial device management products. |
|
macOS, Linux, Command line |
Windows, macOS, Linux |
- Writes local or downloaded images to SD cards
- Can set hostname and Wi-Fi settings in supported images
All 3 strengths for flash- Writes local or downloaded images to SD cards
- Can set hostname and Wi-Fi settings in supported images
- Can wait for a card to be inserted
|
- Hides system drives, so the classic wrong-disk accident is much harder
- Verifies the write by reading the media back
All 4 strengths for balenaEtcher- Hides system drives, so the classic wrong-disk accident is much harder
- Verifies the write by reading the media back
- Flashes Raspberry Pi boards over USB device boot mode
- Windows, macOS Intel and Apple Silicon, and Linux
|
- Supports macOS and Linux
- Progress display requires pv
|
- An Electron app doing a job a 200 KB tool could do
- No persistent storage or multi-boot; one image per stick
All 4 limitations for balenaEtcher- An Electron app doing a job a 200 KB tool could do
- No persistent storage or multi-boot; one image per stick
- Asks about optional analytics on first run
- Windows 10 and later, Intel 64-bit only
|
|
Downloadable app |
Downloadable app |
|
Open source |
Open source |
|
License: MIT |
License: Apache-2.0 |
|
Not stated if an account is needed |
No account needed |
|
Not stated if it works offline |
Offline features available |
Sources for flashCatalog checked October 8, 2026 |
Sources for balenaEtcherCatalog checked September 21, 2026 |
“Not stated” means we have not confirmed it. Features can vary by device and plan.
Copy comparison link