INGInious vs RELATE: catalog facts
INGInious | RELATE |
|
Best for: Programming teachers who want automatic, secure grading of student code |
Best for: Instructors of technical courses who want text-based, version-controlled course content |
|
Free Free and open source under the AGPL; the public instance is free to use. |
Free Free and open source. |
|
Web, Self-hosted |
Web, Self-hosted |
- Runs student code in isolated Docker containers
- Teachers write their own tests for detailed feedback
All 4 strengths for INGInious- Runs student code in isolated Docker containers
- Teachers write their own tests for detailed feedback
- Works as an external grader for Moodle or edX
- Interface translated into many languages
|
- Course content as plain YAML and Markdown under git version control
- Auto-graded code questions with sandboxed execution
All 4 strengths for RELATE- Course content as plain YAML and Markdown under git version control
- Auto-graded code questions with sandboxed execution
- Flexible participation, access and grading rules
- Multiple courses on one installation
|
- Requires Docker and server administration
- Focused on code assessment rather than full course management
|
- No packaged releases; installed from source
- Content authoring assumes comfort with text files and git
|
|
Self-hosted, Hosted service |
Self-hosted |
|
Open source |
Open source |
|
License: AGPL-3.0 |
License: MIT |
|
Not stated if an account is needed |
Not stated if an account is needed |
|
Not stated if it works offline |
Not stated if it works offline |
Sources for INGIniousCatalog checked October 2, 2026 |
Sources for RELATECatalog checked October 2, 2026 |
“Not stated” means we have not confirmed it. Features can vary by device and plan.
Copy comparison link