JWM vs labwc: catalog facts
JWM | labwc |
|
Best for: Lightweight desktops on older or low-powered Linux machines |
Best for: Openbox users moving to a light Wayland setup |
|
Free Free and open source under the MIT licence. |
Free Free and open source. |
|
Linux |
Linux |
- Very small footprint, needing only Xlib
- Runs well on old hardware and the Raspberry Pi
All 4 strengths for JWM- Very small footprint, needing only Xlib
- Runs well on old hardware and the Raspberry Pi
- Optional multi-monitor, SVG and antialiased font support
- Available as a package in many distributions
|
- Lightweight stacking compositor for Wayland
- Familiar to Openbox users
All 3 strengths for labwc- Lightweight stacking compositor for Wayland
- Familiar to Openbox users
- Works with separate panels and tools of your choice
|
- X11 only, no Wayland support
- Stacking only, with no tiling layouts
All 3 limitations for JWM- X11 only, no Wayland support
- Stacking only, with no tiling layouts
- Plain appearance compared with full desktop environments
|
- Needs other programs for a complete desktop
- Wayland only
|
|
Downloadable app |
Downloadable app |
|
Open source |
Open source |
|
License: MIT |
License not stated |
|
No account needed |
No account needed |
|
Offline features available |
Offline features available |
Sources for JWMCatalog checked September 24, 2026 |
Sources for labwcCatalog checked September 23, 2026 |
“Not stated” means we have not confirmed it. Features can vary by device and plan.
Copy comparison link