Kryptos vs Salty: catalog facts
Kryptos | Salty |
|
Best for: Adding encryption to conversations in messengers you do not trust |
Best for: Sending occasional secrets over an untrusted messaging channel |
|
Free Free and open source under the AGPL-3.0 licence. |
Free Free and open source under the MIT licence. |
|
Android, iOS |
Android |
- Adds end-to-end encryption on top of any messaging app or SMS
- Uses the Signal Protocol with keys stored on the device
All 4 strengths for Kryptos- Adds end-to-end encryption on top of any messaging app or SMS
- Uses the Signal Protocol with keys stored on the device
- No accounts or servers; works offline
- Works between iPhone and Android
|
- AES-256-GCM encryption with PBKDF2 key derivation
- Works offline and keeps history on the device
All 3 strengths for Salty- AES-256-GCM encryption with PBKDF2 key derivation
- Works offline and keeps history on the device
- Works alongside any messaging app
|
- Not in the App Store; iOS install requires sideloading or signing
- Both people need Kryptos to read the messages
All 3 limitations for Kryptos- Not in the App Store; iOS install requires sideloading or signing
- Both people need Kryptos to read the messages
- Messenger still sees who you talk to and when
|
- Both sides must exchange the shared key securely beforehand
- Android only
All 3 limitations for Salty- Both sides must exchange the shared key securely beforehand
- Android only
- Small project without an independent security audit mentioned
|
|
Downloadable app |
Downloadable app |
|
Open source |
Open source |
|
License: AGPL-3.0-only |
License: MIT |
|
No account needed |
No account needed |
|
Offline features available |
Offline features available |
Sources for KryptosCatalog checked October 2, 2026 |
Sources for SaltyCatalog checked October 2, 2026 |
“Not stated” means we have not confirmed it. Features can vary by device and plan.
Copy comparison link