Mailcow vs Citadel: catalog facts
Mailcow | Citadel |
|
Free Free and open source, self-hosted. |
Free Free and open source under the GNU GPL, with no paid edition. |
|
Linux, Self-hosted |
Web, Self-hosted |
- Docker packaging makes deployment and updates more manageable
- Includes a full web admin panel and SOGo webmail out of the box
|
- Mail, calendar, contacts, forums, wiki and chat in one server
- Consistent rooms-based structure across features
|
- Requires Docker and server administration knowledge to run
- Resource requirements are higher than a single lightweight mail daemon
|
- The rooms metaphor differs from conventional mail servers
- Requires running and maintaining your own server
|
|
Self-hosted |
Self-hosted |
|
Open source |
Open source |
|
License not stated |
License: GPL |
|
Not stated if an account is needed |
Not stated if an account is needed |
|
Not stated if it works offline |
Not stated if it works offline |
Checked September 22, 2026 | Checked October 2, 2026 |
Catalog facts only. Anything “not stated” is unconfirmed. Check full listings for details.
Copy comparison link