Compare software

MiroTalk SFU vs OpenVidu: catalog facts
MiroTalk SFU	OpenVidu
Free Free and open source under AGPL-3.0; one-time fee licences are also offered.	Free Described by the project as free and open source.
Web, Self-hosted	Web, Self-hosted
SFU architecture scales better than peer-to-peer calls No time limits or room limits	Ready-to-use meeting app plus SDKs for custom apps Screen sharing, chat, recording and branding
Running your own media server needs bandwidth and setup Recordings are saved in the browser rather than on the server	Needs your own server and WebRTC know-how to run Aimed more at organisations than individual users
Web application, Self-hosted	Self-hosted
Open source	Open source
License: AGPL-3.0	License: Apache-2.0
No account needed	Not stated if an account is needed
Not stated if it works offline	Needs internet
Official website Full listing and sources Checked October 2, 2026	Official website Full listing and sources Checked October 2, 2026

Catalog facts only. Anything “not stated” is unconfirmed. Check full listings for details.