Compare software

NATS Server vs Apache ActiveMQ: catalog facts
NATS ServerApache ActiveMQ

Best for: Developers building distributed systems that need a messaging backbone

Best for: Teams that need a self-hosted message broker for their applications

Free

Free and open source under the Apache 2.0 licence.

Free

Free and open source under the Apache 2.0 licence.

Windows, Self-hosted, Command line Windows, Self-hosted
  • Built for high performance
  • Runs on servers, in Docker or at the edge
All 3 strengths for NATS Server
  • Built for high performance
  • Runs on servers, in Docker or at the edge
  • Large, actively maintained open-source project
  • Supports JMS, AMQP, STOMP and MQTT
  • Clients available for many languages
All 4 strengths for Apache ActiveMQ
  • Supports JMS, AMQP, STOMP and MQTT
  • Clients available for many languages
  • High availability and networks of brokers
  • Regular maintenance releases on several series
  • Infrastructure component that needs NATS clients in your applications
  • Aimed at developers and operators, not end users
  • Requires Java and server administration
  • Aimed at developers and operators, not end users
Downloadable app, Self-hosted Downloadable app, Self-hosted
Open source Open source
License: Apache-2.0 License: Apache-2.0
No account needed No account needed
Not stated if it works offline Not stated if it works offline
Sources for NATS Server

Catalog checked October 2, 2026

Sources for Apache ActiveMQ

Catalog checked October 2, 2026

“Not stated” means we have not confirmed it. Features can vary by device and plan.