WinLaunch vs Wox: catalog facts
WinLaunch | Wox |
|
Best for: Windows users who like the macOS Launchpad layout |
Best for: A keyboard launcher that works the same on Windows, macOS and Linux |
|
Free Free and open source under the MIT license. |
Free Free and open source under the GPL. |
|
Windows |
Windows, macOS, Linux |
- Launchpad-style icon grid on Windows
- MIT licensed
All 3 strengths for WinLaunch- Launchpad-style icon grid on Windows
- MIT licensed
- Visual alternative to the Start menu
|
- Fully native with GPU rendering on Windows, macOS and Linux, not Electron
- Around 150 MB of memory in everyday use, so it can stay resident
All 4 strengths for Wox- Fully native with GPU rendering on Windows, macOS and Linux, not Electron
- Around 150 MB of memory in everyday use, so it can stay resident
- Plugins in Node.js, Python or scripts, with a store to browse them
- An open-source alternative to Raycast and Alfred that works on all three platforms
|
- Windows only
- Grid-based rather than keyboard-first
|
- A much smaller plugin ecosystem than Raycast or Alfred
- The version 2 rewrite is relatively young, so expect rough edges
All 4 limitations for Wox- A much smaller plugin ecosystem than Raycast or Alfred
- The version 2 rewrite is relatively young, so expect rough edges
- Deep system integrations vary by platform
- No official mobile or web companion
|
|
Downloadable app |
Downloadable app |
|
Open source |
Open source |
|
License: MIT |
License: GPL-3.0 |
|
No account needed |
No account needed |
|
Offline features available |
Offline features available |
Sources for WinLaunchCatalog checked September 24, 2026 |
Sources for WoxCatalog checked September 21, 2026 |
“Not stated” means we have not confirmed it. Features can vary by device and plan.
Copy comparison link