fish vs Zsh: catalog facts
fish | Zsh |
|
Best for: An interactive shell that is pleasant immediately, with nothing to configure |
Best for: Interactive shell with powerful completion, globbing and prompt theming |
|
Free Free and open source under the GPL. |
Free The open-source application is available without a license fee. |
|
macOS, Linux, Command line |
macOS, Linux, Command line |
- Autosuggestions from history appear as you type with no plugins
- Syntax highlighting shows an invalid command before you run it
All 4 strengths for fish- Autosuggestions from history appear as you type with no plugins
- Syntax highlighting shows an invalid command before you run it
- Tab completions generated from man pages, so they cover real options
- Works well with no configuration file at all
|
- Completion system that knows the options of individual commands
- Recursive globbing and qualifiers that replace many find invocations
|
- Not POSIX-compatible, so bash snippets and scripts often need changing
- No official Windows build
All 4 limitations for fish- Not POSIX-compatible, so bash snippets and scripts often need changing
- No official Windows build
- A smaller plugin ecosystem than zsh
- Minimum supported macOS version is 10.12
|
- Startup configuration grows complicated quickly, which is why frameworks exist
- Scripts written for Zsh are not portable to plain POSIX shells
|
|
Downloadable app |
Downloadable app |
|
Open source |
Open source |
|
License: GPL-2.0 |
License: MIT |
|
No account needed |
Not stated if an account is needed |
|
Offline features available |
Not stated if it works offline |
Sources for fishCatalog checked September 21, 2026 |
Sources for ZshCatalog checked September 22, 2026 |
“Not stated” means we have not confirmed it. Features can vary by device and plan.
Copy comparison link