GeoNode vs uMap: catalog facts
GeoNode | uMap |
|
Best for: Organisations running their own spatial data infrastructure |
Best for: Teachers, groups and websites that need a simple shareable custom map |
|
Free Free and open source under the GPL. |
Free Free and open source, with free public instances. |
|
Web, Self-hosted |
Web, Self-hosted |
- Supports OGC standards such as WMS, WFS, WCS, WMTS and CSW
- Fine-grained permissions and groups for sharing data
All 4 strengths for GeoNode- Supports OGC standards such as WMS, WFS, WCS, WMTS and CSW
- Fine-grained permissions and groups for sharing data
- Django base with REST APIs for customisation
- Active maintenance and development release lines
|
- No coding needed to build and embed a map
- Several public instances run by OpenStreetMap chapters
All 4 strengths for uMap- No coding needed to build and embed a map
- Several public instances run by OpenStreetMap chapters
- Docker image for self-hosting
- Active community and regular releases
|
- A server platform that needs setup and administration
- Aimed at organisations rather than individual map users
|
- Limited to OpenStreetMap-style background layers
- Some community resources are in French
|
|
Self-hosted |
Web application, Self-hosted |
|
Open source |
Open source |
|
License: GPL |
License not stated |
|
Not stated if an account is needed |
No account needed |
|
Not stated if it works offline |
Needs internet |
Sources for GeoNodeCatalog checked October 1, 2026 |
Sources for uMapCatalog checked September 23, 2026 |
“Not stated” means we have not confirmed it. Features can vary by device and plan.
Copy comparison link