Hound vs searchcode: catalog facts
Hound | searchcode |
|
Best for: Teams searching code across many internal repositories |
Best for: Developers and AI coding assistants getting oriented in an unfamiliar public codebase |
|
Free Free and open source under the MIT licence. |
Free Free during beta, with no signup or API key needed. |
|
Web, Self-hosted |
Web |
- Regular expression search across many repositories
- Indexes are kept up to date automatically
All 4 strengths for Hound- Regular expression search across many repositories
- Indexes are kept up to date automatically
- Simple JSON configuration
- Runs from source or Docker
|
- Instant repository dossier from a pasted GitHub URL
- Remote MCP server works with Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and Copilot
All 4 strengths for searchcode- Instant repository dossier from a pasted GitHub URL
- Remote MCP server works with Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and Copilot
- Side-by-side comparison of two repositories
- No signup or API key
|
- Must be built or deployed yourself
- Search only, no code navigation or cross-references
|
- Only covers public repositories
- Free status is tied to the current beta
All 3 limitations for searchcode- Only covers public repositories
- Free status is tied to the current beta
- Hosted service, so it cannot be run offline
|
|
Self-hosted |
Web application, Hosted service |
|
Open source |
Not open source |
|
License: MIT |
License not stated |
|
No account needed |
No account needed |
|
Offline features available |
Needs internet |
Sources for HoundCatalog checked October 2, 2026 |
Sources for searchcodeCatalog checked October 2, 2026 |
“Not stated” means we have not confirmed it. Features can vary by device and plan.
Copy comparison link